|
|
The anthropomorphic fallacy in international relations discourse | by Carlos Escudé |
|
Notes |
| [1]
E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis, London: Macmillan, 1962;
page 149. [2]
Maria Rosa Milos, a doctoral student at the University of Belgrano,
brought to my attention this category of metaphors in international-relations
discourse. [3] P. Ariès and G. Duby (eds.), Historia
de la Vida Privada, Buenos Aires: Taurus 1990,; Vol. I,
page 109. [4]
In Ariès and Duby, op.cit. pages 255-256 and 284. [5]
J.G. Ruggie, "Continuity and transformation in the world polity:
toward a neorealist synthesis", in R.O. Keohane, ed., Neorealism
and its Critics, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, p.
141-148. [6]
J.R. Strayer and D.C. Munro, The Middle Ages, 4th. edition,
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1959, p. 115; cf. Ruggie,
op.cit. p.142. [7]
I. Wallerstein, The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture
and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century,
New York: Academic Press, 1974, p. 32; cf. J.G. Ruggie op.cit.
p. 155, note 22. [8]
J.G. Ruggie, op.cit. p. 143. [9]
J.G. Ruggie, op.cit. p. 143. [10]
J.G. Ruggie, op.cit. p. 144. [11]
J.C. Garnett, "States, State-Centric Perspectives, and Interdependence
Theory", in J. Baylis and N.J. Rengger, Dilemmas of World
Politics: International Issues in a Changing World, Oxford: The
Clarendon Press, 1992; page 64. [12] See, for example, Pericles' funeral oration. Thucydides, Historia de la Guerra del Peloponeso, México D.F.: Editorial Porrúa, 1989; page 83 (Book II, Chapter VII). [13]
R.O. Keohane "Theory of world politics: structural realism and
beyond", in R.O. Keohane (ed.) op.cit. 1986, p. 186. [14]
Keohane and Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition,
Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1977, pages 18, 19, and 53. [15]
K. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley,
1979, Spanish-language edition page 165. [16]
S.D. Krasner, Structural Conflict and the Third World, page
242 of the Spanish-language edition, my translation of the translation. [17]
H. Bull, The Anarchical Society, New York: Columbia University
Press, 1977, p. 70. [18]
J.C. Garnett, "States, state-centric perspectives and interdependence
theory", in J. Baylis and N.J. Rengger (eds.), Dilemmas of
World Politics: International Issues in a Changing World, Oxford:
The Clarendon Press, 1992, page 76. [19]
H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power
and Peace, New York: Albert P. Knopf, 1948, page 10. [20]
R.K. Ashley, "The poverty of neorealism", in R.O. Keohane
(ed.), op.cit. 1986, p. 227. [21]
R.K. Ashley, op.cit. p. 279. [22]
R.K. Ashley, op.cit. p. 280. [23] For the Argentine myths, see C. Escudé, El Fracaso del Proyecto Argentino: Educación e Ideología, Buenos Aires: Tesis/Instituto Di Tella 1990, and C. Escudé, "Contenido nacionalista de la enseñanza de la geografía en la Argentina, 1879-1986", in A. Borón and J. Faúndez (eds.), Malvinas Hoy: Herencia de un Conflicto, Buenos Aires: Puntosur 1989. [24]
Political discourse is particularly affected by this phenomenon, and
speeches of leaders are often an anthology of anthropomorphisms, [25] C. Escudé, La Argentina, ¿Paria Internacional?, Buenos Aires: Belgrano 1984, pages 118-119. The author cited is Miguel Angel Scenna, "Argentina-Chile: el secular diferendo", Part I, Todo es Historia, No. 43, Nov. 1970, page 10. |
|
© 2000. Todos los derechos reservados. |